PER CURIAM.
The sole issue on appeal in this case is whether the Secretary erred in applying the Medical-Vocational Guidelines found in Appendix 2 to Subpart P of Part 404, 20 C.F.R. § 200.00 et seq. (guidelines) when determining that Ernest Jones is not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act.
A long statement of facts and procedural history of this case is not necessary; a brief summary will suffice. Jones' application for disability...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
