FRIO v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B033638.

203 Cal.App.3d 1480 (1988)

250 Cal. Rptr. 819

RICHARD FRIO et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; DONALD IERACE et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

August 26, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wehner & Perlman, Charles C. Wehner and Patrick J. Grannan for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Dern, Mason & Floum, Richard H. Floum, Edward G. Burg and James A. Sedivy for Real Parties in Interest.


OPINION

KLEIN, P.J.

Petitioners Richard Frio and Carousel Records (Frio) seek writ review of a pretrial order precluding Frio's testimony about the contents of separate telephone conversations between Frio and real parties in interest, Carl Maduri (Maduri), Mike Belkin (Belkin), principals of Belkin Maduri Organization, Inc. (BMO), Donald Ierace, professionally known as Donnie Iris...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases