U.S. v. SEVILLE INDUS. MACHINERY CORP.

Crim. No. 87-31.

696 F.Supp. 986 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America v. SEVILLE INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

Sentencing Opinion October 4, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd P. Leff, Antitrust Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Philadelphia, Pa., for the United States.

Stanley A. Teitler, P.C., New York City, for defendants Yoder Machinery Co. and Timothy A. Yoder.

Andrew K. Ruotolo, Jr., Mountainside, N.J., for defendants Carney Machinery, Inc. and Michael J. Carney.

J. Michael Farrell, Sleet & Farrell, Woodbury, N.J., for defendants Martin Mayerson and Mayerson Machinery Mart, Inc.

Barry I. Fredericks, Hackensack, N.J., for defendants Bernard B. Seville and Seville Industrial Machinery Corp.

Larry J. Silverman, Budd, Larner, Gross, Picillo, Rosenbaum, Greenberg & Sade, New York City, for defendants Henry I. Zeisel and Zeisel Machinery Co., Inc.

Michael R. Koblenz, Mound, Cotton & Wollan, New York City, for defendant R.M.E. Machinery Sales, Inc.

Wendell B. Alcorn, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, New York City, for defendants Norman Finkelstein and All State Machinery Corp.

Brian J. Neary, Hackensack, N.J., for defendant Eugene Bell and Globe Metal Working.

Richard A. Norris, Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, Somerville, N.J., for defendant Johnson Machinery Co.

Charles H. Nugent, c/o F. Hartman, Morrestown, N.J., for defendants Albert S. Hernberg and Martin Electric Tool & Salvage Co., Inc.

Anthony Napolitano, Probstein & Napolitano, New York City, for defendant Centre Machinery Co., Inc.

Mark A. Klugheit, Dechert, Price & Rhods, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants Joseph Weiswasser and Metalworking Equipment Co.

Thomas J. Curley, Jr., Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, Mass., for defendant Wigglesworth Machinery Co.

Edward A. Geltman, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, New York City.

Beatriz Souviron D'Amico, Federal Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Newark, N.J.


OPINION

SAROKIN, District Judge.

The defendants in this criminal antitrust case move for dismissal of the indictment. The motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

On September 10, 1987, a grand jury indicted nineteen corporate and seventeen individual defendants1 for violating federal antitrust law and for conspiring to defraud the United States. The court has accepted guilty pleas from, and sentenced, a number of the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases