ATASI CORP. v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY

No. 88-1054.

847 F.2d 826 (1988)

ATASI CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 26, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald E. Mallen, Long & Levit, San Francisco, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Richard E. Flamm.

Karl A. Limbach, Limbach, Limbach and Sutton, San Francisco, Cal., argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Michael E. Dergosits.

Before FRIEDMAN and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge.


BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an unpublished order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, entered March 3, 1987. The district court granted a motion by Seagate Technology (Seagate) to disqualify the law firm of Skjerven, Morrill, MacPherson, Franklin & Friel (the Skjerven firm) from representing Atasi Corporation (Atasi). On June 5, 1987, the district court certified the order for review pursuant to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases