1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 111 N.J.
  5. 111 N.J. 56 (1988)
 

ABBOUD v. VISCOMI

111 N.J. 56 (1988)

543 A.2d 29

MARIE ABBOUD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DOMINICK VISCOMI, D.D.S., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 29, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lisa Murtha argued the cause for appellant (Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, attorneys; Anita Hotchkiss, of counsel; Mark W. Lynch, on the briefs).

David Lustbader argued the cause for respondent (Philip M. Lustbader and David Lustbader, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

The sole question before us is whether plaintiff's dental malpractice complaint was correctly dismissed by the trial court as barred by the two-year statute of limitations. After a hearing conducted pursuant to our decision in Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267 (1973), the court found that plaintiff was aware that defendant had "done something...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases