GLAZE, Justice.
This case involves a question in the law of torts. One issue is presented: whether the trial court erred in granting appellee's motion for directed verdict by finding there was no substantial evidence that the driver, who was allegedly an employee and agent of appellee, was acting within the scope of his employment when he was involved in an accident while driving a tractor-trailer rig. Because the evidence reflects the driver
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.