1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 200 Cal.App.3d
  5. 200 Cal.App.3d 1457 (1988)
 

KAPPEL v. BARTLETT

Docket No. B025210.

200 Cal.App.3d 1457 (1988)

246 Cal. Rptr. 815

KARL G. KAPPEL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DAVID AULDEN BARTLETT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

May 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Edwin B. Stegman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Saphier & Rein and Richard E. Walden for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

HANSON, J.

By second amended complaint, plaintiff Karl G. Kappel (plaintiff and/or Kappel) sought both compensatory and punitive damages from defendants Brian Thomas Fecher (Fecher), David Aulden Bartlett (Bartlett), doing business as Attorney Services Systems, a fictitious name (Attorney Services); Attorney Services Systems, Inc., a California corporation, and Does. Plaintiff alleged three causes of action, i.e., (1) perjury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases