NEIL v. OSP

07-87-387; CA A46012.

758 P.2d 893 (1988)

92 Or.App. 575

Robert NEIL, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Corrections Division, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 17, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Philip Schradle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., DEITS, J., and RIGGS, J. Pro Tem.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of violating an institution disciplinary rule and required him to serve three months in segregation and pay a $100 fine. He first contends that there was not substantial evidence to sustain the finding of guilty. There was. He also argues that imposition of the fine is not authorized. He is correct. Watson v. OSP,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases