1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 859 F.2d
  5. 859 F.2d 788 (1988)
 

U.S. v. SALAS-CAMACHO

No. 87-5341.

859 F.2d 788 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vapsi Akiram SALAS-CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 19, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmundo Espinoza, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

William Q. Hayes, Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Roger W. Haines, Jr. and William Q. Hayes, Asst. U.S. Attys., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WALLACE, FARRIS and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

Vapsi Akiram Salas-Camacho appeals his conviction for smuggling goods into the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545, and making two false denials that he was bringing merchandise into this country, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. He claims that because he declared the goods at the secondary inspection station, he cannot be convicted of smuggling. He also argues the district court erred in rejecting jury instructions to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases