PALMER v. BI-MART COMPANY

86-1166-J-1; CA A42770.

758 P.2d 888 (1988)

92 Or.App. 470

Linda Kay PALMER, Appellant, v. The BI-MART COMPANY, Inc. and Fred Millan, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 10, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Claudette L. Yost, Medford, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Donald E. Johnson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Ralph F. Cobb and Luvaas, Richards and Fraser, P.C., Eugene.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action for employment discrimination, ORS 659.030, and for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants on both claims.1 We reverse and remand.

Defendants have the burden of showing that there are no issues of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We take the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases