1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 702 F.Supp.
  5. 702 F.Supp. 939 (1988)
 

U.S. v. MELO

Crim. No. 88-202-K.

702 F.Supp. 939 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Acquilino MELO, and Manuel Melo, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

December 22, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.J. Cinquegrana, for the U.S.

Rikki Klieman, Friedman & Atherton, Boston, Mass., for Acquilino Melo and Manuel Melo.

Lawrence Arnkoff, Coral Gables, Fla., for defendant Stanley Mumford.

No counsel for Rui Cardoso, Roberto Felizola, Charles Goldman, Stephen Becker and William Rego.

Paula Elden, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant Pedro Camacho.

William A. Brown, Brown & Prince, Boston, Mass., for Roberto Garcia.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEETON, District Judge.

The government moves to disqualify attorneys Jeffrey Weiner and Alan Ross, both of the same law firm, from representing Acquilino Melo and Manuel Melo respectively. In the alternative, if the court does not grant its motion for disqualification on the basis of the government's proffer, the government requests an evidentiary hearing at which time the government would call as witnesses, under subpoena, attorneys...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases