HOFFMAN v. COHEN


538 A.2d 1096 (1988)

Pamela J. HOFFMAN and Warren S. Hoffman, her husband, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Roland F. COHEN, Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: March 4, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney Balick, Wilmington, on behalf of plaintiffs below, appellants.

James B. Ropp (argued) and Richard Galperin of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, on behalf of defendant below, appellee.

Before HORSEY, WALSH and HOLLAND, JJ.


HOLLAND, Justice:

In this appeal, the appellants-plaintiffs below, Pamela J. Hoffman and Warren S. Hoffman ("the Hoffmans"), argue that the Superior Court erred in dismissing their complaint. The basis for the Superior Court's dismissal was its conclusion that the Hoffmans had filed an untimely motion, pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 25, for the substitution of a party following the death of the appellee-defendant below, Roland F. Cohen ("Cohen"). In reaching...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases