GUERRERO v. STAYTON CANNING CO.

WCB No. 85-04520; CA A42870.

757 P.2d 873 (1988)

92 Or.App. 209

In the matter of the Compensation of Ana M. GUERRERO, Claimant. Ana M. Guerrero, Petitioner — Cross-Respondent, v. STAYTON CANNING COMPANY, Respondent — Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 20, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard R. Nielsen, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner — cross-respondent.

Jerry K. Brown, McMinnville, argued the cause for respondent — cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Cummins, Cummins, Brown, Goodman & Fish, P.C., McMinnville.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order insofar as it held that employer's partial denial on March 20, 1985, was applicable to medical care that she received after July 26, 1985. Employer cross-petitions for review, asserting that the Board erred in ruling that the denial was not effective on March 20, 1985. We affirm on the petition and on the cross-petition.

Claimant suffered a compensable injury to her back, hip, neck...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases