1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 853 F.2d
  5. 853 F.2d 751 (1988)
 

INTERSTATE FIRE & CAS. CO. v. STUNTMAN, INC.

No. 87-5655.

853 F.2d 751 (1988)

INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STUNTMAN, INC.; Hal Needham, Heidi Von Beltz, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 5, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack M. Staitman, Staitman & Snyder, Encino, Cal., for plaintiff/appellant.

Harvey A. Schneider, Steven W. Murray, Encino, Cal., for defendants and respondents Stuntman, Inc. and Hal Needham.

Haskell J. Shapiro, Los Angeles, and Belli & Sabih, Beverly Hills, for defendant and respondent Heidi Von Beltz.

Before PREGERSON, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Stuntman, Inc., et. al. on the ground that the district court misinterpreted certain provisions of the excess commercial liability policy it issued to Stuntman. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In August 1979, Interstate issued an excess insurance policy to Stuntman, the company providing stunt services for the producers of the film ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases