1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 36 Ohio
  5. 36 Ohio St. 3d 124 (1988)
 

PARISEAU v. WEDGE PRODUCTS, INC.

No. 87-828.

36 Ohio St. 3d 124 (1988)

PARISEAU, APPELLEE, v. WEDGE PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 13, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sindell, Lowe & Guidubaldi Co., L.P.A., and Claudia R. Eklund, for appellee.

Petro, Rademaker, Matty & McClelland, Robert C. McClelland and James M. Petro, for appellant.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Russell P. Herrold, Jr., and Robert A. Minor, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Manufacturers' Assn.

Mansour, Gavin, Gerlack, & Manos Co., L.P.A., Ernest P. Mansour and Eli Manos, urging reversal for amici curiae, Crawford Fitting Co. et al.

Per Curiam.

Once again, we are asked to distinguish between a factual situation in the workplace giving rise to an inference of aggravated negligence or reckless disregard for the rights of another and one giving rise to the legal concept of an intentional tort. As explained in Kunkler v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 135, 139, 522...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases