1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 199 Cal.App.3d
  5. 199 Cal.App.3d 1389 (1988)
 

ESPINDOLA v. NUNEZ

Docket No. G004174.

199 Cal.App.3d 1389 (1988)

245 Cal. Rptr. 596

STANLEY MORRIS ESPINDOLA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. JOSE L. NUNEZ, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

March 31, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Dale A. Castle, W. Breck MacLaren and Craig F. Castle for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Andrew Lichtman for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

WALLIN, J.

Stanley and Shirley Espindola appeal the trial court's order granting Jose Nunez's motion to quash service of summons based on the Espindolas' failure to exercise due diligence before resorting to substituted service. We reverse.

I

On January 26, 1983, the Espindolas filed a complaint for damages based on negligence, breach of contract, fraud and conspiracy against Jose Nunez, his wife Dayle, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases