1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 205 Cal.App.3d
  5. 205 Cal.App.3d 1354 (1988)
 

SMITH v. RICKARD

Docket No. B027316.

205 Cal.App.3d 1354 (1988)

254 Cal. Rptr. 633

DANIEL SMITH, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARILYN RICKARD et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

November 18, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Price, Postel & Parma, J. Terry Schwartz and Robert S. Patterson for Defendants and Appellants.

William M. Pfeiffer, Steven A. Sokol, Gov Hutchinson, Miller, Starr & Regalia and Harry D. Miller as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

Matsinger & Blakeboro, Diane M. Matsinger, Alan A. Blakeboro and Harrison E. Bull & Associates for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

GILBERT, J.

A real estate broker represents a seller of a 50-acre parcel of commercial property. On the property is a residence and lemon and avocado groves. Here we hold that the broker has no duty to inspect that portion of the property containing the lemon and avocado groves in order to disclose to the buyer facts that would affect the value or desirability of the property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases