1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 758 P.2d
  5. 758 P.2d 798 (1988)
 

MOLINA v. McQUINN

No. 17421.

758 P.2d 798 (1988)

107 N.M. 384

Roberto MOLINA, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Dana McQUINN and the Board of Examiners in Optometry, Respondents-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

August 9, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hal Stratton, Atty. Gen., Kathrin Kinzer-Ellington, David A. Garcia, Asst. Attys. Gen., Santa Fe, for respondents-appellants.

Pedro Palacios, Las Cruces, for petitioner-appellee.

OPINION

SCARBOROUGH, Chief Justice.

Respondents-appellants are Dana McQuinn and the Board of Examiners in Optometry who suspended petitioner-appellee, Robert Molina's, license to practice optometry for fourteen days. The district court reversed the Board's decision. McQuinn and the Board appeal, we reverse.

The Optometry Act, NMSA 1978, Section 61-2-1 to 61-2-18 (Repl.Pamp. 1986) requires that optometrists be certified before they may use topical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases