1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 52 Ohio
  5. 52 Ohio App. 3d 103 (1988)
 

STATE v. RITCHEY

Nos. C-870556 and C-870557.

52 Ohio App. 3d 103 (1988)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. RITCHEY, APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided August 17, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Castellini, city solicitor, Terrence R. Cosgrove, city prosecutor, and William L. Mallory, Jr., for appellee.

Edward P. Bruggeman, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

The central issues in these appeals require our consideration of two subsections of R.C. 2921.13(A). This falsification statute has ten subsections that describe specific types of false statements that are designated as first-degree misdemeanors, as compared to false statements that constitute perjury, a third-degree felony. The two subsections involved in the instant case are (A)(3) and (A)(4) of R.C. 2921.13, and it is our conclusion that false...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases