1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 537 So.2d
  5. 537 So.2d 1014 (1988)
 

BERRY v. ORR

No. 88-1569.

537 So.2d 1014 (1988)

Allen BERRY, D.D.S., Petitioner, v. Honorable George ORR and Honorable David M. Gersten, As Judges of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, in and for Dade County, Florida and Antonio Bendeck, Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied March 2, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kimbrell & Hamann and James F. Asher and Virginia Forbes, Miami, for petitioner.

Ligman, Martin, Shiley, Neswiacheny & Evans and Gordon Evans, Coral Gables, Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty. and Roy Wood, Asst. County Atty., for respondents.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The central question presented for review is whether the prefiling notice requirements established by Section 768.57, Florida Statutes (1985) are applicable to dental malpractice actions. Based on the indistinguishable authority of MacDonald v. McIver, 514 So.2d 1151 (Fla.2d DCA 1987), with which we agree, we hold that the above-stated statutory notice requirements are so applicable. Because the plaintiffs herein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases