1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 693 F.Supp.
  5. 693 F.Supp. 851 (1988)
 

PERFIT v. PERFIT

No. CV 83-7916 AHS.

693 F.Supp. 851 (1988)

June E. PERFIT, Plaintiff, v. Martin J. PERFIT, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

August 25, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul M. Hittelman, Hittelman & Pritikin, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Robert D. Brill, Bonne, Jones, Bridges, Mueller, O'Keefe & Hunt, Los Angeles, Cal., Jerry Miller, Schulman & Miller, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant.

OPINION ON ORDER GRANTING DIRECTED VERDICT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT

STOTLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff June E. Perfit brought this action seeking damages under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520, on the basis of defendant Martin J. Perfit's installation of a recording device on a telephone in the marital home. A jury trial commenced on May 24, 1988. At the conclusion of plaintiff's case completed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases