U.S. v. REIFSTECK

No. 87-3759.

841 F.2d 701 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David W. REIFSTECK, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided March 9, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy J. Deardorff (argued), Deardorff & Rebel, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant-appellant.

Kathleen M. Brinkman (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MILBURN and GUY, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.


CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

David W. Reifsteck appeals his conviction of conspiracy to unlawfully use electronic devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. For the following reasons, we affirm the conviction.

I.

David Reifsteck was a licensed investigator who operated his corporation, Domestic Investigations, Inc. DBA Corporate & Domestic Investigations, in Cincinnati, Ohio. The grand jury in the United States District Court for the Southern...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases