1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 743 S.W.2d
  5. 743 S.W.2d 798 (1988)
 

ARKANSAS VINEGAR CO. v. ASHBY

No. 87-309.

743 S.W.2d 798 (1988)

294 Ark. 412

ARKANSAS VINEGAR COMPANY and American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Haril L. ASHBY (Dec'd.), Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 1, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay N. Tolley, Fayetteville, for petitioners.

Constance G. Clark, Fayetteville, for respondent.

PURTLE, Justice.

We granted review of the decision of the Court of Appeals pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(6), which provides that this court may review decisions of the Court of Appeals when the case involves an issue of significant public interest or a legal principle of major importance. The issue to be considered is whether the Court of Appeals was correct in determining that the Workers' Compensation Commission improperly denied the decedent's dependent children...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases