MAL v. UNIQUE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO.

WCB 84-06350, 85-09396; CA A44114.

763 P.2d 751 (1988)

93 Or.App. 703

In the matter of the Compensation of Rozalia MAL, Claimant. Rozalia Mal, Petitioner — Cross-Respondent, v. UNIQUE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO., D. Maintenance and Ohio Casualty, Respondents — Cross-Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 2, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Karen M. Werner, and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.

Jerry K. Brown, McMinnville, argued the cause for respondents — cross-petitioners. With him on the brief was Cummins, Cummins, Brown, Goodman & Fish, P.C., McMinnville.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Worker's Compensation Board order reversing the referee and holding that claimant failed to prove that her carpal tunnel syndrome is compensable. Employer cross-petitions from the portion of the Board's order holding that claimant's psychiatric disorder is compensable. On de novo review,1 we affirm.

Claimant, 51 years old at the time of the hearing, began working for employer as a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases