1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 857 F.2d
  5. 857 F.2d 646 (1988)
 

ROBERTS v. PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO.

Nos. 87-2106, 87-2128 and 87-2278.

857 F.2d 646 (1988)

Phillip D. ROBERTS; Lynn Roberts; Denny Delk; Karen Delk; William J. Freschi, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO., Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Houston Harbaugh, P.C., Defendant/Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 19, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solomon B. Cera, David B. Gold, P.C., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellants/cross-appellees.

Richard N. Patterson, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant/appellee/cross-appellant.

James J. Corbelli, Lillick, McHose & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant/appellee.

Before SCHROEDER and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and STEPHENS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OVERVIEW

Plaintiffs are a class of investors who purchased interests in limited partnerships offered by an array of individuals and corporate entities. Defendants are accountants and attorneys who provided professional services to the partnerships. When the value of the partnerships failed to materialize, the investors brought suit under federal and state securities laws. The district court granted summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases