1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 849 F.2d
  5. 849 F.2d 648 (1988)
 

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

Nos. 87-1446, 87-1770.

849 F.2d 648 (1988)

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF SSA FIELD OPERATIONS LOCALS, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration Field Operations, Intervenor. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, National Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 13, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Kanter and Howard S. Scher, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., were on the motions to reconsider and to permit intervenor to proceed in place of petitioner, filed by intervenor Department of Health and Human Services, and on the opposition to motion to dismiss, filed by respondent Federal Labor Relations Authority.

Ruth E. Peters, Sol., William E. Persina, Deputy Sol., Arthur A. Horowitz, Associate Sol. and Elsa D. Newman, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, D.C., were on the motion to dismiss and on the response in opposition to motion to proceed as petitioner, both filed by respondent.

Before MIKVA, EDWARDS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER, TO PROCEED AS PETITIONER, AND TO DISMISS

Opinion PER CURIAM.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the motions to reconsider the order dismissing the case and to proceed as the petitioner and the opposition thereto in Case No. 87-1446 and the motion to dismiss in Case No. 87-1770 and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the court that the motion to reconsider the order dismissing the case in 87-1446...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases