No. 87-6074.

857 F.2d 631 (1988)

GOLDEN STATE TRANSIT CORP., a California corporation, d/b/a Yellow Cab of Los Angeles, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 15, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zachary D. Fasman, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.

John F. Haggerty, Asst. City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before WALLACE, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

In Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 475 U.S. 608, 618, 106 S.Ct. 1395, 1401, 89 L.Ed.2d 616 (1986), the Supreme Court held that the City of Los Angeles ("City") could not condition renewal of a taxi company's franchise on settlement of a labor dispute. The Court observed that such an action "destroyed the balance of power designed by Congress [in the National Labor Relations Act], and...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases