SANDY v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. H004303.

201 Cal.App.3d 1277 (1988)

247 Cal. Rptr. 677

DONALD SANDY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Respondent; DAON CORPORATION et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

June 7, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Frederic L. Schaefer, John R. Hetland, Charles A. Hansen, Thiele R. Dunaway and Hetland & Hansen for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Elliot L. Bien, Kathryn N. Richter, Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, Patrick H. Fabian and Terence E. Helmick for Real Parties in Interest.


OPINION

AGLIANO, P.J.

This petition for mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure1 section 437c, subdivision (l), correctly contends that the trial court should have granted Sandy's summary judgment motion for two reasons: the 10-year statute of limitations, section 337.15, bars the action; and Sandy is not liable to Daon for contribution.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases