PILKINGTON PLC v. METRO CORP.

No. 87-3030.

526 So.2d 943 (1988)

PILKINGTON PLC and Chance Pilkington Limited, Petitioners, v. METRO CORPORATION, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and William L. Gardner and Peter Buscemi, Washington, D.C., Lowell L. Garrett and Nancy A. Copperthwaite, Miami, for petitioners.

Bailey, Dawes & Hunt and Mercedes C. Busto, Miami, for respondent.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and PEARSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Pilkington plc and Chance Pilkington Limited [petitioners] present a petition for writ of certiorari to review the trial court's order striking their counterclaim to the crossclaim of Metro Corporation [Metro] as a sanction for discovery violations. We grant the petition and quash the order.

Petitioners and Metro are codefendants in a lawsuit instituted by plaintiff, Visual Scene, Inc. After extensive discovery, the court issued an order requiring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases