JOHNSTON v. JAMES RIVER CORPORATION

WCB 85-13546; CA A46152.

756 P.2d 696 (1988)

91 Or.App. 721

In the matter of the Compensation of Roy M. JOHNSTON, Claimant. Roy M. Johnston, Petitioner, v. JAMES RIVER CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 22, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Karen M. Werner and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.

Brian L. Pocock, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and GRABER, J., and RIGGS, J. Pro Tem.


PER CURIAM.

In this workers' compensation case, we review under the standards stated in Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200, 752 P.2d 312 (1988).

The Workers' Compensation Board reversed the referee on the compensability issue. When the referee makes adequate findings and conclusions of law which the Board either affirms or specifically adopts, it is not necessary for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases