1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 695 F.Supp.
  5. 695 F.Supp. 753 (1988)
 

REFAC ELECTRONICS v. A & B BEACON BUSINESS MACHINES

No. 85 Civ. 8563 (RWS).

695 F.Supp. 753 (1988)

REFAC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. A & B BEACON BUSINESS MACHINES CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 30, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cobrin, Feingertz & Godsberg, New York City, for plaintiffs; Peter T. Cobrin, of counsel.

Evans, Osborne & Kreizman, Red Bank, N.J., for defendants; Gale Rhodes, Jr., of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Sears, Roebuck & Co. ("Sears") has moved for partial summary judgment against plaintiffs Refac Electronics Corporation and Refac Technology Development Corporation (collectively "Refac") pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Refac has cross moved for sanction against Sears pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons set forth below both the motion and the cross motion are denied.

Facts and Prior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases