1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 849 F.2d
  5. 849 F.2d 585 (1988)
 

RANDOMEX, INC. v. SCOPUS CORP.

Nos. 87-1295, 87-1345.

849 F.2d 585 (1988)

RANDOMEX, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCOPUS CORP. and Dennis Haskamp, Defendants/Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vern Schooley, of Fulwider, Patton, Rieber, Lee & Utecht, Long Beach, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Stephen J. Strauss, Long Beach, Cal. Also on the brief was Zachary R. Karol, Bingham, Dana & Gould, Boston, Mass.

Paul J. Hayes, of Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin & Hayes, Boston, Mass., argued for defendants/cross-appellants. With him on the brief was Steven M. Bauer.

Before BISSELL, Circuit Judge, NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit Judge.

BISSELL, Circuit Judge.

Randomex, Inc. appeals the final judgment of the district court dismissing Randomex's complaint because of the invalidity of United States Letters Patent No. 3,803,660 ('660) for failure to disclose the "best mode." See Randomex Inc. v. Scopus Corp., 2 USPQ2d 1622, 1627 (D.Mass.1987). Randomex also appeals a prior district court order setting aside a jury award of damages to Randomex, and ordering a new trial for damages under Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases