1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 861 F.2d
  5. 861 F.2d 554 (1988)
 

SEDERQUIST v. COURT

No. 87-2806.

861 F.2d 554 (1988)

David N. SEDERQUIST, Marilyn T. Sederquist, Frank Gariffo, Marie Gariffo, J.W. Schuchardt, Warren W. Robinson, Edith Robinson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Arthur COURT, Annette Court, Walter I. Thurman, Apula Thurman, Louie A. Gerdine, Edith C. Gerdine, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 14, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert G. Schuchardt, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Richard T. Tarrant and Lucy E. Bettis, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before SNEED, CANBY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court's dismissal of their suit to recover attorneys' fees under a substantial benefit theory for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

I.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

This is the third visit to this court of litigation that has gone on for about fifteen years. See Sederquist v. City of Tiburon, 765 F.2d 756

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases