U.S. v. BOGARD

No. 87-3051.

846 F.2d 563 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard W. BOGARD, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 13, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. McFarland, Newton Falls, Ohio, for defendant-appellant.

Michael R. Spaan, U.S. Atty., Julie Werner-Simon, Asst. U.S. Atty., District of Alaska, Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WRIGHT and CANBY, Jr., Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, Senior District Judge.


EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Richard Bogard alleges two errors as the basis for overturning convictions of attempted income tax evasion: denial of a motion to continue and a motion to inspect and copy jury selection materials. We affirm.

I. MOTION TO CONTINUE

Ten days before trial was scheduled to begin, and almost two months after his initial appearance, Bogard moved for a continuance. It was denied. He argues that the court abused its discretion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases