1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 840 F.2d
  5. 840 F.2d 546 (1988)
 

SOO LINE R. CO. v. ESCANABA & LAKE SUPERIOR R. CO.

No. 87-1975.

840 F.2d 546 (1988)

SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESCANABA & LAKE SUPERIOR RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided February 23, 1988.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert V. Abendroth, Whyte & Hirschboeck, S.C., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff-appellant.

Larry H. Mitchell, Arnall, Golden & Gregory, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Before CUDAHY, EASTERBROOK, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

The Soo Line Railroad and the Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad are locked in a durable struggle attributable to the Connecting Line, some 21 miles of track between Crivitz and Marinette, Wisconsin. In re Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.R., 784 F.2d 831 (7th Cir.1986) (Escanaba I), holds that the Soo must arbitrate with the Escanaba about ownership of the line. (The arbitrators...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases