1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 764 P.2d
  5. 764 P.2d 621 (1988)
 

AMFAC, INC. v. MARTIN

WCB 86-01972; CA A47324.

764 P.2d 621 (1988)

94 Or.App. 177

In the matter of the Compensation of Delores A. Martin, Claimant. AMFAC, INC., and Leonard J. Russo Co., Petitioners, v. Delores A. MARTIN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 23, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet M. Schroer, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief were William H. Replogle and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland.

Kenneth D. Peterson, Jr., Hermiston, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Employer seeks review of a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board affirming without opinion the referee's determination that claimant's carpal tunnel syndrome is compensable. The referee reviewed the conflicting medical evidence and concluded that, because claimant had had no prior wrist symptoms and her treating physician believed that the present symptoms constituted a worsening of carpal tunnel syndrome...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases