In this workers' compensation case, claimant experienced a compensable back injury, which employer accepted. Employer subsequently issued a "partial denial" of claimant's scoliosis. Claimant properly challenged the denial by requesting a hearing. The referee determined that the scoliosis was compensable, and that, in addition, employer's denial of the condition was precluded by Bauman v. SAIF,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MEHERIN v. STAYTON CANNING CO.
86-00160; CA A45922.
764 P.2d 619 (1988)
94 Or.App. 173
In the matter of the Compensation of Barbara June MEHERIN, Claimant. Barbara June Meherin, Petitioner — Cross-Respondent, v. STAYTON CANNING CO., Respondent — Cross-Petitioner.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted September 9, 1988.
Decided November 23, 1988.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bruce D. Smith, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Michael B. Dye, Salem.
Craig A. Staples, Portland, argued the cause for respondent — cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinisch & Klor, P.C., Portland.
Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
