1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 696 F.Supp.
  5. 696 F.Supp. 685 (1988)
 

CROCKER v. PIEDMONT AVIATION, INC.

Civ. A. No. 86-1673(RCL).

696 F.Supp. 685 (1988)

Hobart N. CROCKER, Jr., Plaintiff, v. PIEDMONT AVIATION, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

August 3, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pierre Murphy (argued) (Robert M. Beckman, David M. Kirstein with him, on the brief), Beckman & Kirstein, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Rebecca K. Troth (argued) (Donald T. Bliss with her, on the brief), O'Melveny & Myers, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

Plaintiff Hobart N. Crocker, Jr. claims he had a right of first hire as a "protected employee" under section 43 of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, and that defendant Piedmont's refusal to hire him gives rise to this cause of action. He seeks reinstatement and back pay. Piedmont moves for summary judgment, while Crocker moves for partial summary judgment that he is a protected employee under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases