RETURN ON INV. SYSTEMS v. TRANSLOGIC CORP.

No. 87 C 9967.

702 F.Supp. 677 (1988)

RETURN ON INVESTMENT SYSTEMS, Plaintiff, v. TRANSLOGIC CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

December 19, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Slater, Jerry M. Santangelo, Gregg R. Hague, Sperling, Slater & Spitz, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

David Roston, Paul Petit, Peter Lubin, Brad Grayson, Altheimer & Gray, Chicago, Ill., Bruce L. Montgomery, Melvin C. Garbow, Helene B. Madonick, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., for defendant.


ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. See Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

FACTS

The facts, construed in favor of the plaintiff/non-movant, are as follows. Defendant, TransLogic Corporation ("TransLogic"), is a manufacturer (in the "manufacturing market") and installer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases