STATE v. COFFEY

CM 87-0204; CA A46922.

764 P.2d 605 (1988)

94 Or.App. 94

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Sean J. COFFEY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 23, 1988.

Reconsideration Denied January 13, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Groom, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Frank Gruber, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


WARREN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance and assigns error to the trial court's denial of both his motion to suppress evidence of cocaine seized from his premises pursuant to a search warrant and his motion to controvert. He challenges the legal sufficiency and the factual accuracy of the affidavit on which the search warrant was issued. We affirm.

Officer Claxton submitted the affidavit which, following a description...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases