1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 693 F.Supp.
  5. 693 F.Supp. 666 (1988)
 

MID-STATE FERTILIZER v. EXCH. NAT. BANK OF CHICAGO

No. 87 C 1078.

693 F.Supp. 666 (1988)

MID-STATE FERTILIZER CO., an Illinois corporation, Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel, Plaintiffs, v. The EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

July 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Wexstten, Mt. Vernon, Ill., Thomas E. Leiter, Leiter, Leiter & Sahn, Peoria, Ill., for plaintiffs.

David L. Piercy, Howard & Howard, Mt. Vernon, Ill., David N. Missner, Franklin S. Schwerin, Angel Rodriquez, Schwartz, Cooper, Kolb & Gaynor, Chicago, Ill., Mark G. Arnold, Dorothy White-Coleman, Husch, Eppenberger, Donohue, Cornfeld & Jenkins, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HART, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this case are Mid-State Fertilizer Company and its two shareholders, Lasley and Maxine Kimmel. The Kimmels are also officers of Mid-State. The defendant is The Exchange National Bank of Chicago.1 In February 1985, Exchange provided a two-million-dollar line of credit to Mid-State. Repayment of this loan was secured by a security agreement imposing a first lien on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases