PALMER v. CENTRAL OREGON IRR. DIST.

37507-WE; CA A40845.

754 P.2d 601 (1988)

91 Or.App. 132

Merritt PALMER, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. CENTRAL OREGON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 11, 1988.

Reconsideration Denied July 8, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Holmes, Bend, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Gray, Fancher, Holmes, Hurley & Bischof, Bend.

Douglas A. Haldane, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. On the brief was Philip H. Garrow, Bend.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Defendant appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals in this action arising out of defendant's alleged failure to reinstate plaintiff to his former position or to another position in defendant's employ when he sought to return to work after suffering a compensable injury. Plaintiff states three claims (called "counts" in his pleadings): first, that defendant violated ORS 659.415 by not restoring him to his former position or, if it was unavailable, to another...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases