LOVE v. CITY OF PORT CLINTON

No. 87-434.

37 Ohio St. 3d 98 (1988)

LOVE, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF PORT CLINTON ET AL.; HICKMAN, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 8, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen E. Cottrell, for appellee.

Ward, Marein & Gillette, Leo R. Ward and Jose M. Gonzalez, for appellant.


H. BROWN, J.

The issue is whether the action, as pled against Hickman, is barred by the statute of limitations for assault and battery claims. We find that it is.

When bodily injury results from negligence, the two-year statute of limitations, R.C. 2305.10, is the appropriate statute of limitations. However, when bodily injury results from an assault or battery, the one-year statute of limitations, R.C. 2305.111, is applicable.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases