FOX v. STRICKLAND

No. 87-7131.

837 F.2d 507 (1988)

Thomas C. FOX, Appellant, v. Marion D. STRICKLAND, et al.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

January 22, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Fox, pro se.

Mary L. Wilson, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Frederick D. Cooke, Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for appellees Marion D. Strickland, et al.

Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, STARR and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

Pro se appellant Thomas Fox has appealed from an order of the district court dismissing his complaint. The district court ruled that Fox had conceded a motion to dismiss made by the defendants by virtue of his failure to oppose the motion in the time prescribed by local rule. Before dismissing the case, the district court did not determine whether Fox had been informed of the pendency of the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases