1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 40 Ohio
  5. 40 Ohio App. 3d 94 (1988)
 

CONTEX, INC. v. CONSOLIDATED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. C-860407.

40 Ohio App. 3d 94 (1988)

CONTEX, INC., APPELLEE, v. CONSOLIDATED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET AL., APPELLANT; TOPPER ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided January 27, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steer, Strauss, White & Tobias and R. Guy Taft, for appellee.

Bernard C. Fox, for appellants.

SHANNON, J.

Defendants-appellants Consolidated Technologies, Inc. ("Consolidated Technologies"), Nathaniel J. Kuller and Craig S. Merton have taken the instant appeal from the judgment entered by the court below upon its finding the appellants in contempt of an injunction restricting their solicitation of business under the name "Consolidated Technologies, Inc." On appeal, the appellants contest the standard of proof applied and the balance struck by the court below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases