1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 431 N.W.2d
  5. 431 N.W.2d 907 (1988)
 

HAPKA v. PAQUIN FARMS

No. C4-88-410.

431 N.W.2d 907 (1988)

Conrad HAPKA, individually, Brian Hapka, individually, and Conrad and Brian Hapka, Appellants, v. PAQUIN FARMS, et al., Gust Hangsleben, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted January 26, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark E. O'Boyle, Dickel, Johannson, Taylor, & Rust, P.A., Crookston, for appellants.

Dennis M. Sobolik, Roger C. Malm, Brink, Sobolik, Severson, Vroom & Malm, P.A., Hallock, for respondents, Paquin Farms, et al.

Donald Leonard, East Grand Forks, for respondent, Gust Hangsleben.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Paul A. Strandberg, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent, Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture.

Heard, considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., FORSBERG and LOMMEN, JJ.

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Appellants Conrad and Brian Hapka (Hapkas), purchasers of certified potato seed, brought an action against respondents Paquin Farms, Paquin Potato Company, Richard Paquin, David Paquin (Paquins), P & H Farms, and Gust Hangsleben, sellers, seeking damages for losses sustained when the seed purchased was infected with bacterial ring rot. Appellants also brought suit against the State of Minnesota inspectors for failure to inspect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases