1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 35 Ohio
  5. 35 Ohio St. 3d 98 (1988)
 

BLON v. BANK ONE, AKRON, N.A.

No. 86-2054.

35 Ohio St. 3d 98 (1988)

BLON ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BANK ONE, AKRON, N.A., APPELLANT, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 10, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michaels & McGown and Daniel J. McGown, for appellees.

Guy, Lammert & Towne, Ronald N. Towne and Cathy S. Drescher, for appellant.

Baker & Hostetler, George W. Hairston and Mark A. Johnson, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Automobile Dealers Association.

MOYER, C.J.,

For the reasons that follow, we reverse, and reinstate summary judgment for Bank One.

The first question presented by this appeal is whether, as a matter of law, Bank One had a duty to disclose the fee paid to West for arranging the Blons' loan with Bank One under the federal Truth in Lending Act, Section 1601 et seq., Title 15, U.S. Code, and regulations promulgated thereunder in Part 226, Title 12, C.F.R. The court of appeals reversed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases