We affirm the judgment entered in favor of the insurer wherein the trial court correctly recognized that the insurer was not required to provide the appellant with uninsured motorist coverage because the appellant was not a class one insured, nor was he a class two insured entitled to coverage under the Mullis rule. Mullis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
FILMORE v. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY
No. 87-1821.
529 So.2d 798 (1988)
Vincent FILMORE, Appellant, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 9, 1988.
Rehearing Denied August 31, 1988.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Hershoff & Levy and Jay Levy, Bloom & Feola, Miami, for appellant.
Highsmith, Strauss & Glatzer and Philip Glatzer, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
