THOMAS v. BOARD OF PAROLE

CA A44039; SC S34662.

749 P.2d 576 (1988)

305 Or. 46

Hubert Harry THOMAS, Petitioner On Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

February 9, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, for petitioner on review.

Scott McAlister and David L. Kramer, Asst. Attys. Gen., Salem, for respondent on review. With them on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner, a prisoner, complains that in setting his parole release date the Board of Parole (Board) improperly failed to consider a mitigating circumstance. The Board Action Form (BAF), which this court explained in detail in the case of Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or. 618, 740 P.2d 760 (1987), contains as one finding of fact that "No mitigation was cited/offered or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases