STATE v. TUCKER

TC 85-0025; CA A36725; SC S34368, S34604.

749 P.2d 576 (1988)

305 Or. 43

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner On Review/Respondent On Review, v. Mindi Marie TUCKER, Respondent On Review/Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

February 2, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the petition for review and Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the supplemental petition for review on behalf of the petitioner State of Or. With them on the petitions were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, filed the petition for review on behalf of the petitioner Mindi Marie Tucker. With him on the petition was Des Connall and Dan Lorenz, P.C., Portland.


MEMORANDUM OPINION.

The petitions for review of the State of Oregon and the defendant are denied. The supplemental petition for review of the State of Oregon is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals, 740 P.2d 182, is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issue raised in the supplemental petition of the State of Oregon.

PETERSON, C.J., and JONES, J., would have allowed review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases